# HealthPrecheck - llms.txt

> LLM-readable manifest. Features-only; no fabricated traffic claims.

## Entity
- Product of: LX AI Micro-SaaS Factory
- Product site: https://healthprecheck.lxsaihub.com/
- Hub: https://lxsaihub.com/tools/healthprecheck.html

## Positioning
- Product name: HealthPrecheck
- One-line: Pre-check a pasted supplement or wellness marketing claim against 21 CFR 101.93 and the FTC health-claim framework; get a scored, severity-ranked report — disease-claim boundary, missing mandatory disclaimer, unsubstantiated "proven" cues, absolutes, implied FDA approval — in 60 seconds.
- Honesty: Heuristic pre-check — not a health-claims certification or legal advice. No clinical-trial, lab, facility-registration or FDA-record verification, and no enforcement prediction performed. Whether a claim is substantiable depends on evidence outside the text; challenge outcomes depend on the FDA, FTC and platforms.

## Checks
- Disease-claim boundary — a supplement that "treats / cures / prevents / mitigates" a named disease (21 CFR 101.93 and the drug-vs-supplement line), always high, not fixable by a disclaimer
- Missing disclaimer — a structure/function statement ("supports", "promotes", "helps") with no 101.93(c) "not evaluated by the FDA… not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease" sentence
- Substantiation — "clinically proven / studies show / doctor recommended" with no named basis (FTC competent-and-reliable-evidence theme)
- Absolutes & implied approval — "no side effects", "100% safe", "miracle", "guaranteed results", "FDA approved" on a supplement
- Nutrient-content & wellness advisories — "high in / good source of" thresholds, "detox / boost immunity" buzzwords, health-safety bundling — labeled, never measured as fact

## Policy references (snapshot 2026-10-23; each fetched HTTP 200 with supplement/claim body content this build, via the Cornell LII mirror)
- 21 CFR 101.93 Certain types of statements for dietary supplements: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/21/101.93
- 21 CFR 101.36 Nutrition labeling of dietary supplements: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/21/101.36
- 21 CFR 101.13 Nutrient content claims — general principles: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/21/101.13
- 21 CFR 101.9 Nutrition labeling of food: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/21/101.9
- RFC 2119: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119
- Note: the eCFR canonical `/current/*` pages 302-redirect to a bot-unblock interstitial (HTTP 200 but the body is the block page, not the regulation), ftc.gov returns 403, and 21 CFR 1107 is 404 on LII from this build's network; those are excluded and documented (see lib/rules/SOURCES.md), cited instead via the LII mirror above. Non-US regimes are advisories only.

## FAQ
Q1. What is HealthPrecheck?
Q1. A micro SaaS for pre-publish health-claim checks: paste the exact supplement or wellness claim, get quoted findings by severity, a 0-100 risk score, and a fix checklist before you print or publish.
Q2. Will a high score make my claim legally compliant?
A2. No. Lawfulness depends on the real product, its actual evidence and your jurisdiction — outside what any text checker can see.
Q3. Does it verify my trial, lab results or registration?
A3. No — deliberately not. It checks only the wording you paste.
Q4. Price?
A4. Free fair-use demo; Pro from $19/mo when listed on Waffo.