Paste your claim. Get a severity-ranked pre-check against the published FDA/FTC framework — the disease boundary, the mandatory 101.93 disclaimer, the substantiation behind any "proven" wording — before a label becomes a warning letter.
No credit card required · Cancel anytime
Key Takeaways

Decision-support health-claim ranks — not a certification and not a legal audit.
HealthPrecheck pre-checks dietary-supplement and wellness marketing wording against the rules the FDA and FTC set out — the disease-claim boundary and mandatory disclaimer in 21 CFR 101.93, the substantiation standard for objective health claims, and the prohibition on implying FDA approval of a supplement — returning a scored, severity-ranked report with concrete edits before a label, ad or product page goes live.
Controller / Processor — When packs mention privacy roles, we use GDPR Art.4 labels: Controller and Processor (decision-support only).
“Cures anxiety”, “prevents diabetes” — naming a disease you treat/cure/prevent turns a supplement into an unapproved drug claim under the FDA/FTC boundary, regardless of any disclaimer. It is the single highest-severity pattern.
A “supports immune function” statement must carry the mandatory 21 CFR 101.93(c) disclaimer (“not evaluated by the FDA… not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease”). Without it, even a modest claim is a prohibited one.
“Clinically proven” or “studies show” is read as a factual claim requiring competent and reliable scientific evidence on hand before you publish — asserting proof without naming it is a substantiation gap.
“FDA approved” or “FDA certified” on a supplement misrepresents the law — supplements are never pre-approved — and reads as an endorsement that does not exist.
Severity-ranked findings from your claim against published FDA/FTC factors — including which claim is missing which disclaimer or basis.
Disease-claim wording, missing 101.93 disclaimers, unsubstantiated “proven” cues, absolutes and implied approval, each with quoted evidence.
High / medium / low so you fix the warning-letter-ready gaps first.
Actionable edits — you still own the final copy.
Markdown you can paste into a ticket or label thread.
Built for supplement and wellness brands shipping label claims every week.
Disease-claim wording, missing 101.93 disclaimers, unsubstantiated “proven” cues, absolutes and implied approval, each with quoted evidence.
High / medium / low so you fix the warning-letter-ready gaps first.
Actionable edits — you still own the final copy.
Markdown you can paste into a ticket or label thread.
The exact wording you plan to publish — plus claim kind, surface, and substantiation basis.
Deterministic engine ranks findings by severity and checks each claim for its required disclaimer and basis.
You edit the copy. HealthPrecheck never rewrites or publishes.
Severity-ranked findings from your claim against published FDA/FTC factors — including which claim is missing which disclaimer or basis.
“Cures anxiety”, “prevents diabetes” — naming a disease you treat/cure/prevent turns a supplement into an unapproved drug claim under the FDA/FTC boundary, regardless of any disclaimer. It is the single highest-severity pattern.
Health-claims findings — Disease-claim wording, missing 101.93 disclaimers, unsubstantiated “proven” cues, absolutes and implied approval, each with quoted evidence.
Paste your claim wording with claim kind, surface and basis. Deterministic severity ranks first, each claim checked for the disclaimer and basis its rule expects. Optional AI never invents findings. You review before printing.
Read the methodology →| # | HealthPrecheck | Manual FDA/FTC reading / banned-word lists |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Copy vs health-claim factors in one paste | Hours reading regulation explainers |
| 2 | Severity-ranked fix list with disclaimer logic | Scattered checklist notes or a warning letter |
| 3 | Self-serve from $19/mo | Enterprise compliance suites |
| 4 | Decision-support only | May over-promise approval guarantees |
AI draft · human review · decision-support only.
Read methodology →Open studioor generate below.
Capability cards describe the studio. No fabricated customer counts.
A pasted claim becomes ranked findings against published FDA/FTC factors.
Claim kind, surface and basis tune how aggressively disease-claim and disclaimer risks escalate.
Every finding ships a suggested edit — you still decide.
What each plan includes — quotas reflect the enforced fair use limits.
| Dimension | Free | Pro | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| Usage | |||
| AI runs | 3/day · 15/mo | 40/day · 300/mo | 200/day · 3,000/mo |
| Report export | Watermarked | Clean export | Clean export |
| Audit log | Not included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Product | |||
| Disease-claim boundary: flags “treats / cures / prevents [disease]”, which turns a supplement into an unapproved drug claim regardless of any disclaimer | ✓ Included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Missing-disclaimer check: a structure/function statement caught without the mandatory 21 CFR 101.93(c) “not evaluated by the FDA” disclaimer | ✓ Included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Implied FDA approval: “FDA approved / certified” wording on a supplement (which is never pre-approved) flagged as misrepresentation | ✓ Included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Substantiation cues: “clinically proven / studies show / doctor recommended” without a named basis, graded against the FTC competent-and-reliable-evidence theme | ✓ Included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| BYOK (your LLM key) | Not included | Not included | ✓ |
| SSO | Not included | Not included | Roadmap |
| Support & compliance | |||
| Support | Community | Priority | Custom SLA |
Licenses are issued manually after your payment is confirmed: we generate one per paid order and send it to the purchase email, typically within a few hours. Enter it below to activate Pro on this device — no account needed. Nothing yet? Write to lixingliangsy@163.com and reference your order email.
A scored, severity-ranked pre-check of one pasted supplement or wellness claim against the patterns 21 CFR 101.93 and the FTC health-claim framework describe — decision-support drafts, never a legal opinion.
No. Lawfulness depends on the real product, its actual evidence, the label rendering and your jurisdiction — whether a "clinically proven" figure or a facility registration is true lives outside what any text checker can see. HealthPrecheck only flags the published factors present in the wording you paste.
Yes. Self-serve plans cancel anytime; access continues until period end.
No. Start with email signup or Demo mode in the studio, then upgrade when ready.
No for Free/Pro. AI runs are included in your plan (fair use) via our platform key. Enterprise can optionally bring your own OpenAI key (BYOK) — configure it at /settings (key stays server-side only).
Free includes 3 AI checks/day and 15/month. Pro includes 40/day and 300/month. At the fair-use limit the studio returns a clear QUOTA_EXCEEDED notice with the reset time — the Rule-based demo keeps working; Enterprise BYOK covers heavier volume.
Payments are processed by Waffo Pancake (merchant of record).
You receive access confirmation; fulfillment is tracked via webhook + order logs.
The claim text (the exact published wording), the claim kind, the surface it appears on, your substantiation basis, and strictness.
No. Heuristic pre-check — not a health-claims certification and not legal advice.
Ranked findings with quoted evidence — disease treatment wording, a structure/function claim missing its 101.93 disclaimer, unsubstantiated "proven" cues, absolutes and implied FDA approval — plus a fix checklist; always review.
Demo is labelled; live wording needs a configured AI key.
Supplement and wellness brands, product and label teams, and agencies publishing health claims.
Your pasted claim text and the published 21 CFR 101.93 and FTC health-claim framework.
No — deliberately not. It never reads a study, lab report, facility registration or FDA record; whether the underlying evidence holds appears as an advisory checklist item only.
No. It judges only the wording you paste and suggests concrete fixes; you still write and publish.
| Dimension | Manual | HealthPrecheck |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | Hours reading FDA/FTC explainers | Seconds per claim draft |
| Consistency | Varies by reviewer memory | Same FDA/FTC factors every run |
| Output | Free-form checklist notes | Structured pre-check report |
| Best for | Final sign-off | Pre-flight QA per health claim |
When not to use: Skip it when you need a lawyer’s opinion on FDA/FTC exposure, a real clinical trial or lab test to prove an efficacy figure, confirmation that a facility registration exists, or automated publishing. This only pre-checks the claim wording you paste.
Click a tab to expand it; click again to hide. All content stays on the page for search engines.
Join builders using HealthPrecheck. Free to try — no card needed.
Trusted · Cancel anytime